A lot of moral philosophers have said that we have a moral obligation to do x. But hold on there! Let’s back up a bit. The question that needs to be asked is why. Why do we have a moral obligation to do x? In fact, let’s take it one step further: why do we have moral obligations at all? I could imagine one responding back saying, “well, we should have moral obligations because. . . ” Well, hold on there. The “should” in that sentence already implies an obligation. In other words, it’s stating that we have a moral obligation to have a moral obligation. But then, why have that second order moral obligation. Again, the response could be “Well, we should have a moral obligation to have a moral obligation because. . .” and again it’s repeating itself. So the question remains: why do we have moral obligations? Should we have moral obligations? If so why, and to what?