Fareed Zakaria on CNN had an interesting round table about Iran. Two people were for reform and the other person was for attacking Iran. I found all of them intelligent and they gave their case equally well. What really intrigued me was what Zakaria recommended: maybe we should get used to a nuclear Iran, but with extreme caution. It surprised me, but his argument makes a lot of sense: if we attack Iran, most of the Arab world would support Iran, and because the War on Terror is already costly and unpopular, we can’t do Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan all at the same time. The only solution would be to be there for a long time, which won’t work, or to bring in a draft. Yikes! At the same time, this will only delay Iran from getting the nuclear weapon by only a few years; it won’t stop them from getting it. Thus, allowing them to get the nuclear weapon might be a better option, but with caution. You can check it here and here.
Casual/Committed Sex… on Tennis and Pair Figure Skating… Rocky Mountain Sex a… on Rocky Mountain Sex and Intimac… Sexual Objectivity v… on Is There Such a Thing as… Sexual Objectivity v… on Raja Halwani’s “On… shaunmiller on Love: From Qualities to the…
- Abortion Aesthetics Animals Anti-Natalism Art Article Autonomy Benatar Book Review Books Camus Casual Sex Children Consent Culture Death Drugs Economics Education Emotions Environment Epistemology Ethics Evolution Family Feminism Food Free Will Gender Government Guns Health History Humor Incarceration Justice Language Law Libertarianism Logic Love Marriage Math Middle East Mind Monogamy Movies Music News Nietzsche Paper Topic Peter Singer Philosophy Politics Polyamory Pornography Promiscuity Prostitution Psychology Race Relationships Religion Rights Same-Sex Schopenhauer Science Sexuality Sexual Objectification Single Stoicism Studies Teaching Values War Will
Follow me on TwitterMy Tweets
Number of times this site has been visited:
- 150,849 hits