A Conflict in Hume’s Ethics

Hume has famously said that “Reason is, and ought to be, the slave of the passions.”

Later on, he also said, “You cannot get an ‘ought’ from an ‘is.'”

Doesn’t the second statement contradict his first statement? Any Hume scholarships out there that can explain this?

About shaunmiller

I have just completed a visiting position as an assistant professor at Dalhousie University. My ideas are not associated with my employer; they are expressions of my own thoughts and ideas. Some of them are just musings while others could be serious discussions that could turn into a bigger project. Besides philosophy, I enjoy martial arts (Kuk Sool Won), playing my violin, enjoying coffee around town, and experimenting with new food.
This entry was posted in Epistemology, Ethics, Hume, Language. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to A Conflict in Hume’s Ethics

  1. thekillerj says:

    Maybe Hume was a joker. That’s my hIpothotheese.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s