Capital Punishment and Economics

Whether you’re for or against the death pentalty, everyone agrees that to execute a prisoner is much more expensive than life imprisonment.  Life imprisonment is about $800,000 per person.  To execute, it costs $2.3 million.  So executing a prisoner is about a 200% increase in costs.

An article at CNN here shows that most states are reconsidering the death penalty because it’s just too much of a burden to the taxpayers.  The economy is going down nationally so states are finding creative ways to save money.  From the article:

“Because of the downturn in the national economy, we are facing one of the largest budget deficits in our history,” state Sen. Carolyn McGinn, a Republican, said in an opinion piece posted on TheKansan.com Friday. “What is certain is we are all going to have to look at new and creative ways to fund state and community programs and services.”

The state would save more than $500,000 per case by not seeking the death penalty, McGinn wrote, money that could be used for “prevention programs, community corrections and other programs to decrease future crimes against society.”

So this isn’t a moral argument against the death penalty, but rather an economic one.  Economically speaking, I think it makes sense.

Advertisements

About shaunmiller

I am a Ph. D student at Marquette University. The primary purpose of this blog is to get my ideas out there, and then have other people scrutinize, critique, build upon, and systematize beliefs. This blog will sometimes pertain to what I'm learning in my classes, but it will occasionally deal with non-classroom issues that I'm thinking about as well.
This entry was posted in Capital Punishment, Economics. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Capital Punishment and Economics

  1. thekillerj says:

    2.3 million dollars to kill someone? I’ll choke somebody for free! WTF man?
    I’m all about money being allocated to prevention programs, but SOME people are worth the money.

  2. shaunmiller says:

    It’s expensive because of appeals and such. So either get rid of the death penalty (which would lessen the appeals), or else change the structure of the Constitution so that appeals won’t be allowed. It seems that the former is easier.

    As for the money, I think the governors aren’t really concerned about using that money for prevention programs, I think they just want to use the money on something else. After all, taxes are taxes and if you had to choose between executing some guy or spending that money on something else, chances are that if you can’t get the money somewhere else, you’ll probably hold off on executing that guy.

  3. Pingback: What I’ve Learned this Past Year — 2009 Edition « Shaun Miller’s Weblog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s